Interestingly, information-seeking behaviour appeared to correlate with participation in clinical trials. Overall, 34% of women who had searched for information on clinical trials had gone on to participate in one. In contrast, only 12% of women who did not search for information participated in clinical trials.Despite their participation in this survey, it is worth noting that even in developed countries, only a minority of these “engaged” women participated in trials. Trial participation seemed to be largely influenced by access. Participation in countries with few ongoing clinical trials such as Egypt (13% of women had participated in a trial) was low compared with that in countries such as Belgium (27%), Canada (35%), and Mexico (35%). Unfortunately, although the number of clinical trials available for patients with MBC has increased in recent years, there has not yet been a comparable increase in the number of patients be- ing enrolled.(15)
Limitations and recommendations
The results of the BRIDGE Survey should be interpreted with caution, particularly with regard to comparisons between countries. As might be predicted in a global survey, cultural differences most certainly have influenced the fundings. It is di cult to qualify and quantify these cultural differences in a preliminary survey such as this one. These differences may be related to the way physicians communicate with their patients or to women’s primary point of contact (physicians versus nurses). Furthermore, cultural mores may influence patients’ experience of social stigma or personal shame associated with a disease that may be seen as “sexualized.” In addition, some of the developing countries may not have any established breast cancer support networks, which in turn may in influence the responses of women in these countries.
On the basis of the survey’s findings, the BRIDGE Survey Steering Committee recommends the following:
■ Increase the quality and quantity of MBC-related activities covered by the media and patient-interest groups in order to shift dialogue in the public domain toward MBC.
■ Ensure that all existing and newly available medical and support materials on MBC are culturally relevant, up to date, and easily accessible. Consider prioritizing the Internet as a source of this literature.
■ Provide patients having MBC with a broad range of information from medical to nonmedical, and ensure that information is translated into local languages.
■ Encourage healthcare professionals to have more comprehensive conversations with women with MBC, ensuring that quality-of-life issues are emphasized in discussions.
■ Help women with MBC to develop tools for communicating and sharing their experiences more e effectively with family, friends, and their community.
■ Develop more initiatives to educate the broader community (eg, commu- nity leaders and workplaces). Engage relevant advocacy organizations and healthcare professionals in activities that focus attention on women living with MBC.
Conclusions
A diagnosis of MBC is devastating, yet many women in our survey showed an extraordinary ability to cope. “It made my life spiral out of control and left me broken and hopeless,” said Darlene. “ is learn- ing process and renewed sense of empowerment gives me the greatest gift a cancer patient could ever receive— HOPE!”
A clear message from the BRIDGE Survey is that most women with MBC and both information and support important. Those who seek out information are more likely to be actively involved in their treatment decisions and to participate in clinical trials. A 2006 online survey of 618 women with MBC, most from the United States, undertaken by the organization Living Beyond Breast Cancer, reached a similar conclusion.16 As more and more women live longer with metastatic disease, offering informational resources for this population takes on increasing importance. Our study also suggests that informed patients tend to be more collaborative with their physicians. e voluntary participation of these women in clinical trials facilitates the translation of novel therapeutics from the laboratory to the clinic. With the development of new treatments comes the possibility of transforming MBC into a truly chronic disease, one that most affected patients will be able to live with for extended periods of time, as some do today. For an informed patient at this critical point in breast cancer science, there is much to learn about novel therapies and approaches to treating and understanding the disease. Clearly, a majority of women with MBC do want to learn. In fact, women in our survey requested up- dates on new medical research and treatments more often than on any other topic.
Support services are equally critical. With an incurable disease that requires ongoing treatment, quality-of-life issues assume priority. e adverse effects of therapy, as well as the symptoms of the disease, take a physical and emotional toll on women and their families. A focus on treating the whole patient, not just cancer, becomes critical, as do the services of an integrated and multidisciplinary healthcare team.
The overarching concern reflected globally in the BRIDGE Survey has to do with the invisibility of this large patient population, especially striking in the countries with well-developed breast cancer communities. Until now, shame, silence, and isolation have been hallmarks of MBC. However, we know what has happened with other life-threat-
metastatic breast cancer to step out from the pink ribbon’s shadow.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Af liations: Ms. Mayer is a Patient Advocate with AdvancedBC.org, New York, NY; Dr. Huñis is an Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine at the University of Buenos Aires School of Medi- cine, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Dr. Oratz is a Clinical Associate Professor at the New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY; Ms. Glennon is Director of Nursing for Cancer Services with the International Society of Nurses in Cancer Care/University of Kansas Hospital, Kansas City, KS; Ms. Spicer is the Breast Cancer Program Coordinator with CancerCare of Long Island, New York, NY; Ms. Caplan is Director of Programs & Partnerships with Living Beyond Breast Cancer, Haverford, PA; and Dr. Fallow- eld is Director of the CRUK Sussex Psychosocial Oncology Group at the Brighton and Sussex Medical School, East Sussex, United Kingdom.
Conflicts of interest:
Ms. Mayer, Ms. Glennon, Ms. Caplan, and Dr. Fallow eld are consultants to Pfizer. Ms. Mayer, Ms. Glennon, and Dr. Fallow eld have received honoraria from P zer. Ms. Glennon is a consultant to and has received honoraria from Merck. Ms. Caplan’s organiza- tion (Living Beyond Breast Cancer) has received unrestricted educational grants from Pfizer.